Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked5
VS
Beef T-bone steak, cooked
Beef T-bone steak, cooked2

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Beef T-bone steak, cooked for more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    198 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    25.98 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    9.61 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    3.27 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN66 mg
    71 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    327 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    3.66 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    26 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef T-bone steak, cooked · Foodatron