Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3
VS
Caribou, cooked Leader
Caribou, cooked5

Caribou, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Caribou, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more potassium.

Pick Caribou, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    167 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    29.77 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    4.42 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    1.7 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    310 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    16 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    6.17 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Caribou, cooked · Foodatron