Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3
VS
Lamb liver, cooked Leader
Lamb liver, cooked5

Lamb liver, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Lamb liver, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Lamb liver, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    220 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    29.79 g
    30.57 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    2.53 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    8.81 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    3.41 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    56 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    221 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    8.28 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    4 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Lamb liver, cooked · Foodatron