Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked4
VS
Lamb liver, cooked
Lamb liver, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Lamb liver, cooked for less sodium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.42 g
    13.9 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    2.82 g
    4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.97 g
    1.55 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    38.6 mg
    25.45 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN238.6 mg
    100.45 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.36 mg
    3.64 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.09 mg
    3.76 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8.77 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.82 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Lamb liver, cooked · Foodatron