Beef eye of round, cooked vs Moose, cooked

Beef eye of round, cooked4

Moose, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Moose, cooked for less saturated fat, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
171 kcal
134 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN29.79 g
29.27 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
4.83 g
0.97 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.66 g
0.29 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN66 mg
69 mg
Potassiummore is better
WIN408 mg
334 mg
Calciummore is better
WIN16 mg
6 mg
Ironmore is better
1.86 mg
4.22 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
15 mg
24 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
5 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.