Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked2
VS
Moose, cooked Leader
Moose, cooked6

Moose, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Moose, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Moose, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.42 g
    21.84 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.82 g
    0.72 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.97 g
    0.22 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN38.6 mg
    51.49 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.6 mg
    249.25 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.36 mg
    4.48 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.09 mg
    3.15 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8.77 mg
    17.91 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    3.73 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Moose, cooked · Foodatron