Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked6
VS
Beef pastrami
Beef pastrami3

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Beef pastrami for more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    21.8 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.36 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.1 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    5.82 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    2.68 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN66 mg
    1078 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    210 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    2.22 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    17 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef pastrami · Foodatron