Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked6
VS
Beef pastrami
Beef pastrami3

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Beef pastrami for more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.42 g
    14.83 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.24 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.07 g
  • Total fat
    2.82 g
    3.96 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.97 g
    1.82 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN38.6 mg
    733.33 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN238.6 mg
    142.86 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.36 mg
    6.8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.09 mg
    1.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8.77 mg
    11.56 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef pastrami · Foodatron