Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3
VS
Wild boar, cooked
Wild boar, cooked3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Wild boar, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, calcium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    160 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    28.3 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    4.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.66 g
    1.3 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    396 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    16 mg
    16 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.86 mg
    1.12 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Wild boar, cooked · Foodatron