Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked1
VS
Wild boar, cooked Leader
Wild boar, cooked6

Wild boar, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Wild boar, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more iron.

Pick Wild boar, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.42 g
    17.69 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.82 g
    2.74 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.97 g
    0.81 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    38.6 mg
    37.5 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.6 mg
    247.5 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    9.36 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.09 mg
    0.7 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8.77 mg
    16.88 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Wild boar, cooked · Foodatron