Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked3
VS
Beef round, cooked Leader
Beef round, cooked4

Beef round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef flank steak, cooked: 100 g · Beef round, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Beef round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    163 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    27.55 g
    30.08 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    4.79 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.84 g
    1.84 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    378 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    16 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    2.9 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    15 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Beef round, cooked · Foodatron