Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked2
VS
Beef round, cooked Leader
Beef round, cooked5

Beef round, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Beef round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    13.64 g
    18.45 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.61 g
    2.94 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.9 g
    1.13 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.24 mg
    42.33 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    161.39 mg
    231.9 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    8.91 mg
    9.82 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.89 mg
    1.78 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN10.89 mg
    9.2 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Beef round, cooked · Foodatron