Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked2
VS
Beef sirloin, cooked Leader
Beef sirloin, cooked5

Beef sirloin, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef sirloin, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    219 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    27.55 g
    29.02 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    10.54 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    4.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    58 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    355 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    18 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    1.96 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Beef sirloin, cooked · Foodatron