Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked3
VS
Beef sirloin, cooked
Beef sirloin, cooked3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, iron and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.64 g
    13.25 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.61 g
    4.81 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.9 g
    1.87 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.24 mg
    26.48 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    161.39 mg
    162.1 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN8.91 mg
    8.68 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.89 mg
    0.89 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    10.89 mg
    10.96 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Beef sirloin, cooked · Foodatron