Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked7
VS
Bologna
Bologna2

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Bologna for more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    308 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    15.2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    5.49 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    4.42 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    24.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    9.3 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    960 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN326 mg
    315 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    18 mg
    85 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    1.21 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    17 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Bologna · Foodatron