Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked2
VS
Caribou, cooked Leader
Caribou, cooked6

Caribou, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Caribou, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Caribou, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    167 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    27.55 g
    29.77 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    4.42 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.84 g
    1.7 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    60 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN326 mg
    310 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    18 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    6.17 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.