Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked3
VS
Lamb liver, cooked Leader
Lamb liver, cooked4

Lamb liver, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Lamb liver, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Lamb liver, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    220 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    27.55 g
    30.57 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    2.53 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    8.81 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.84 g
    3.41 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    56 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN326 mg
    221 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    8.28 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    4 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Lamb liver, cooked · Foodatron