Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef sirloin, cooked
Beef sirloin, cooked3
VS
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked4

Chicken breast, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    13.25 g
    18.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.81 g
    2.16 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.87 g
    0.61 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.48 mg
    44.85 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN162.1 mg
    155.15 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    8.68 mg
    9.09 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.89 mg
    0.63 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    10.96 mg
    17.58 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef sirloin, cooked vs Chicken breast, cooked · Foodatron