Beef sirloin, cooked vs Salmon, cooked

Beef sirloin, cooked4

Salmon, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Salmon, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN13.25 g
10.73 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
4.81 g
6 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.87 g
1.16 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN26.48 mg
29.61 mg
Potassiummore is better
162.1 mg
186.41 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
WIN8.68 mg
7.28 mg
Ironmore is better
WIN0.89 mg
0.17 mg
Magnesiummore is better
10.96 mg
14.56 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
1.8 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.