Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef stew, canned
Beef stew, canned4
VS
Chili con carne with beans Leader
Chili con carne with beans6

Chili con carne with beans leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chili con carne with beans comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef stew, canned for less sugar, less sodium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    107 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    4.41 g
    5.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    7.85 g
    13.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.9 g
    3.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.76 g
    1.87 g
  • Total fat
    5.53 g
    3.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    1.25 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN388 mg
    449 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    163 mg
    264 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    12 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.48 mg
    1.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.7 mg
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef stew, canned vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron