Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef stew, canned
Beef stew, canned3
VS
Chili con carne with beans Leader
Chili con carne with beans7

Chili con carne with beans leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chili con carne with beans comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef stew, canned for less sodium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    4.45 g
    5.42 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    7.93 g
    12.24 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.91 g
    3.08 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.78 g
    1.75 gWIN
  • Total fat
    5.59 g
    3.24 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.21 g
    1.17 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN391.92 mg
    419.63 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    164.65 mg
    246.73 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    12.12 mg
    30.84 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.51 mg
    1.25 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8.08 mg
    26.17 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.71 mg
    0.19 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef stew, canned vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron