Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef vegetable soup
Beef vegetable soup4
VS
Chili con carne with beans Leader
Chili con carne with beans6

Chili con carne with beans leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chili con carne with beans comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef vegetable soup for less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    31 kcal
    107 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.23 g
    5.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.06 g
    13.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.8 g
    3.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.45 g
    1.87 g
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    3.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.34 g
    1.25 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN349 mg
    449 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    69 mg
    264 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    8 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.45 mg
    1.34 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1 mg
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef vegetable soup vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron