Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned3
VS
Mahi-mahi, cooked Leader
Mahi-mahi, cooked5

Mahi-mahi, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Mahi-mahi, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Mahi-mahi, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    109 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    23.72 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    0.9 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.24 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    113 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    533 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    19 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    1.45 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    38 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Mahi-mahi, cooked · Foodatron