Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned3
VS
Mahi-mahi, cooked Leader
Mahi-mahi, cooked5

Mahi-mahi, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Mahi-mahi, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Mahi-mahi, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    21.54 g
    21.76 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.89 g
    0.83 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.24 g
    0.22 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    678.31 mg
    103.67 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    312.05 mg
    488.99 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN109.64 mg
    17.43 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.6 mg
    1.33 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43.37 mg
    34.86 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.98 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Mahi-mahi, cooked · Foodatron