Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked3
VS
Monkfish, cooked
Monkfish, cooked3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Monkfish, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    97 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    18.56 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    1.95 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    50 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    513 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.41 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    27 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Monkfish, cooked · Foodatron