Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked2
VS
Monkfish, cooked Leader
Monkfish, cooked5

Monkfish, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Monkfish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Monkfish, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.26 g
    19.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    3.41 g
    2.01 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.88 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    27.17 mg
    23.71 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    175.54 mg
    528.87 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    5.43 mg
    10.31 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.71 mg
    0.42 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN34.78 mg
    27.84 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.03 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Monkfish, cooked · Foodatron