Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Oysters, canned Leader
Oysters, canned5

Oysters, canned leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Oysters, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Oysters, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    68 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    7.06 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    3.91 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    2.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.63 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    112 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    229 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    45 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    6.7 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    54 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Oysters, canned · Foodatron