Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked5
VS
Flounder/sole, cooked
Flounder/sole, cooked2

Bluefish, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Flounder/sole, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Flounder/sole, cooked for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    86 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    15.24 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    2.37 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.54 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    363 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    197 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.62 mg
    0.23 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Flounder/sole, cooked · Foodatron