Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked4
VS
Flounder/sole, cooked
Flounder/sole, cooked3

Bluefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Flounder/sole, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.16 g
    17.72 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.42 g
    2.76 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.74 g
    0.63 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48.43 mg
    422.09 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN300 mg
    229.07 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5.66 mg
    29.07 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.39 mg
    0.27 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN26.42 mg
    25.58 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Flounder/sole, cooked · Foodatron