Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Shad, cooked
Shad, cooked3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Shad, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN16.16 g
    8.62 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    3.42 g
    7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.74 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    48.43 mg
    25.79 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN300 mg
    195.24 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5.66 mg
    23.81 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.39 mg
    0.49 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN26.42 mg
    15.08 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Shad, cooked · Foodatron