Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Tilefish, cooked Leader
Tilefish, cooked4

Tilefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Tilefish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Tilefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Tilefish, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    24.49 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    4.69 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.87 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    59 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    477 mg
    512 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    26 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.62 mg
    0.31 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Tilefish, cooked · Foodatron