Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked2
VS
Tilefish, cooked Leader
Tilefish, cooked5

Tilefish, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Tilefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Tilefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.16 g
    16.66 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    3.42 g
    3.19 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.74 g
    0.59 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    48.43 mg
    40.14 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    300 mg
    348.3 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    5.66 mg
    17.69 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.39 mg
    0.21 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN26.42 mg
    22.45 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Tilefish, cooked · Foodatron