Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Canned tuna in water, drained Leader
Canned tuna in water, drained4
VS
Pork chop, cooked
Pork chop, cooked3

Canned tuna in water, drained leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Canned tuna in water, drained: 100 g · Pork chop, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Canned tuna in water, drained comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    116 kcal
    209 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    25.51 g
    25.61 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.82 g
    11.06 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.23 g
    3.52 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    55 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    344 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    11 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.53 mg
    0.79 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN27 mg
    25 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Canned tuna in water, drained vs Pork chop, cooked · Foodatron