Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Canned tuna in water, drained Leader
Canned tuna in water, drained5
VS
Pork chop, cooked
Pork chop, cooked2

Canned tuna in water, drained leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Canned tuna in water, drained comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for less sodium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN21.99 g
    12.25 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.71 g
    5.29 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    1.68 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    43.1 mg
    26.32 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN204.31 mg
    164.59 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9.48 mg
    11.48 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.32 mg
    0.38 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN23.28 mg
    11.96 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Canned tuna in water, drained vs Pork chop, cooked · Foodatron