Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Canned tuna in water, drained
Canned tuna in water, drained2
VS
Yellowfin tuna, cooked Leader
Yellowfin tuna, cooked5

Yellowfin tuna, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Yellowfin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for more calcium and more iron.

Pick Yellowfin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    21.99 g
    22.42 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.71 g
    0.45 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    0.16 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    43.1 mg
    41.54 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    204.31 mg
    405.38 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.48 mg
    3.08 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.32 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    23.28 mg
    32.31 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Canned tuna in water, drained vs Yellowfin tuna, cooked · Foodatron