Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted Leader
Capon, roasted5
VS
Quail, cooked
Quail, cooked3

Capon, roasted leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Capon, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Quail, cooked for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN12.65 g
    11.06 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.09 g
    6.21 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.42 g
    1.74 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN21.4 mg
    22.91 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN111.35 mg
    95.15 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    6.11 mg
    6.61 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.65 mg
    1.95 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN10.48 mg
    9.69 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.01 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Quail, cooked · Foodatron