Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked2
VS
Chicken liver, cooked Leader
Chicken liver, cooked6

Chicken liver, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken liver, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Chicken liver, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    11.79 g
    14.65 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.52 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.51 g
    3.9 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.51 g
    1.23 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN40.17 mg
    45.51 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    99.16 mg
    157.49 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN10.04 mg
    6.59 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.58 mg
    6.96 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.21 mg
    14.97 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    16.71 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken liver, cooked · Foodatron