Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked3
VS
Duck, meat only, roasted Leader
Duck, meat only, roasted4

Duck, meat only, roasted leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Duck, meat only, roasted comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more calcium.

Pick Duck, meat only, roasted for less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN11.79 g
    11.68 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.51 g
    5.57 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.51 g
    1.97 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    40.17 mg
    32.34 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    99.16 mg
    125.37 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN10.04 mg
    5.97 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.58 mg
    1.34 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.21 mg
    9.95 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.