Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked4
VS
Quail, cooked
Quail, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Quail, cooked for less sodium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN11.79 g
    11.06 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.51 g
    6.21 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.51 g
    1.74 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    40.17 mg
    22.91 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN99.16 mg
    95.15 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN10.04 mg
    6.61 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.58 mg
    1.95 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.21 mg
    9.69 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.01 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.