Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate

Chickpeas, cooked leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chickpeas, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein and less sugar.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN18.8 g
    5.4 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    16.72 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    4.63 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    2.93 g
  • Total fat
    2.16 g
    1.58 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.61 g
    0.16 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    44.85 mg
    4.27 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    155.15 mg
    177.44 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    9.09 mg
    29.88 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.63 mg
    1.76 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    17.58 mg
    29.27 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.79 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chickpeas, cooked · Foodatron