Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked2
VS
Turkey breast, raw Leader
Turkey breast, raw6

Turkey breast, raw leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Turkey breast, raw comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for less sugar and less sodium.

Pick Turkey breast, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    18.8 g
    20.75 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.12 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.04 g
  • Total fat
    2.16 g
    1.3 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.61 g
    0.25 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN44.85 mg
    99.12 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    155.15 mg
    212.28 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    9.09 mg
    9.65 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.63 mg
    0.64 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    17.58 mg
    24.56 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Turkey breast, raw · Foodatron