Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw Leader
Chicken breast, raw6
VS
Duck breast, cooked
Duck breast, cooked2

Chicken breast, raw leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken breast, raw comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Duck breast, cooked for more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN18.75 g
    16.14 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    2.18 g
    3.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.47 g
    1.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN37.5 mg
    46.34 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN278.33 mg
    217.89 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN4.17 mg
    2.44 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.31 mg
    3.67 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN23.33 mg
    17.89 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    5.04 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Duck breast, cooked · Foodatron