Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken breast with skin, roasted4
VS
Chicken wing, cooked
Chicken wing, cooked2

Chicken breast with skin, roasted leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken breast with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken wing, cooked for more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, saturated fat and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN15.13 g
    15 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.95 g
    4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.11 g
    1.11 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN36.04 mg
    45.32 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN124.37 mg
    103.45 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7.11 mg
    7.88 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.54 mg
    0.57 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN13.71 mg
    10.34 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast with skin, roasted vs Chicken wing, cooked · Foodatron