Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chickpeas, cooked
Chickpeas, cooked3
VS
Edamame, cooked Leader
Edamame, cooked7

Edamame, cooked leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Edamame, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Edamame, cooked for more protein, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    5.4 g
    9.84 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.72 g
    7.36 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.63 g
    4.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    2.93 g
    1.8 gWIN
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    4.3 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.16 g
    0.51 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4.27 mg
    4.96 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    177.44 mg
    360.33 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    29.88 mg
    52.07 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.76 mg
    1.88 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29.27 mg
    52.89 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.79 mg
    5.04 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chickpeas, cooked vs Edamame, cooked · Foodatron