Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chickpeas, cooked Leader
Chickpeas, cooked5
VS
Yellowfin tuna, cooked
Yellowfin tuna, cooked4

Chickpeas, cooked leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chickpeas, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Yellowfin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sugar, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on saturated fat.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    5.4 g
    22.42 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.72 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.63 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    2.93 g
    0 gWIN
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    0.45 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.16 g
    0.16 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4.27 mg
    41.54 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    177.44 mg
    405.38 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN29.88 mg
    3.08 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.76 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29.27 mg
    32.31 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.79 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chickpeas, cooked vs Yellowfin tuna, cooked · Foodatron