Teff, cooked leads 5–0 · 5 categories decided
Both compared at 100 kcal.
The verdict
Teff, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 5 nutrient match-ups.
Pick Teff, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.
Head-to-head
- Energy100 kcal100 kcal
- Proteinmore is better2 g3.83 gWIN
- Carbohydrate15.6 g19.66 g
- Fibermore is better2.4 g2.77 gWIN
- Total sugarsless is better3.6 g—
- Total fat3.6 g0.64 g
- Saturated fatless is better0.6 g—
- Sodiumless is better96 mg7.92 mgWIN
- Potassiummore is better—105.94 mg
- Calciummore is better20 mg48.51 mgWIN
- Ironmore is better0.72 mg2.03 mgWIN
- Magnesiummore is better—49.5 mg
- Vitamin Cmore is better——
- Vitamin Dmore is better——
Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.
