Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Ancient Grains Probiotic Granola0
VS
Leader
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch6

Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch leads 6–0 · 6 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch comes out ahead, winning 6 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    454.55 kcal
    370 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    9.09 g
    11 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    70.91 g
    82 g
  • Fibermore is better
    10.91 g
    11 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    16.36 g
    10 gWIN
  • Total fat
    16.36 g
    1.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.73 g
    0.25 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    436.36 mg
    107.5 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    90.91 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    3.27 mg
    12 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Ancient Grains Probiotic Granola vs Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch · Foodatron