Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Pork chop, cooked
Pork chop, cooked4
VS
Salmon, cooked
Salmon, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Salmon, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN12.25 g
    10.73 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.29 g
    6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.68 g
    1.16 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.32 mg
    29.61 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    164.59 mg
    186.41 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN11.48 mg
    7.28 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.38 mg
    0.17 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    11.96 mg
    14.56 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Pork chop, cooked vs Salmon, cooked · Foodatron