Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Shad, cooked Leader
Shad, cooked2
VS
Albacore Tuna1

Shad, cooked leads 2–1 · 3 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Shad, cooked comes out ahead, winning 2 of 3 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Shad, cooked for less sodium and more iron.

Pick Albacore Tuna for more protein.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    252 kcal
    126.76 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    21.71 g
    23.24 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    17.65 g
    3.52 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    1.06 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN65 mg
    218.31 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    492 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    60 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.24 mg
    1.06 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    38 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.