Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Shad, cooked
Shad, cooked1
VS
Leader
Albacore Tuna2

Albacore Tuna leads 2–1 · 3 categories decided · 1 tie

Shad, cooked: 100 g · Albacore Tuna: serving (142 g).

The verdict

Albacore Tuna comes out ahead, winning 2 of 3 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Shad, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Albacore Tuna for more protein and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    252 kcal
    180 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    21.71 g
    33 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    17.65 g
    5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    1.5 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN65 mg
    310 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    492 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    60 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    1.24 mg
    1.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    38 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.